Post by Bri on May 25, 2015 15:25:50 GMT
Currently the theory is we are a war clan and that is our priority.
In reality I think we are a clan that likes to war. For the majority they turn up, do their 2 war attacks and then get back to regular looting. Some use the forum and create posts as I requested a long time ago, namely Target, Expected Stars and Confidence Level. Others at least make the effort to post in the forum but only list 1 target which is better than nothing, but really doesn’t do much for the planning. Very few say when they will attack. Then once we get into war, past the first wave of guys who did use the forum, there begins all the “who should I hit?” questions. OK let me pick a random number from my ass and there you go. I haven’t a clue what you think of the remaining bases so you tell me. It feels like the list of people who fall into that category is growing and it’s a pain in the ass. If it’s all written down in the forum it’s a hell of a lot easier to assign people targets and understand what might be best for the clan. And to those who can’t be arsed or think it’s a hassle to post on the forum, try making the decisions in war when you have no information.
The filling of defensive war cc’s falls on a small number of players, which consider a number have lvl2 witches now is a bit frustrating.
Then we have war performance.
Most keep bases regardless of whether they are 3 starred in previous wars.
Several need to change their mind set attack wise. I’m seeing the same people make the same mistakes in wars. I’ve added some videos previously to help people learn different tactics and I think everyone who does not get what they aimed for should be doing a review and figuring out what went wrong. That way they actually learn and should not make the same mistake again.
Something that needs to be clear is that 3 stars win wars and hitting higher for 2 rather than lower for 3 is not a benefit to the clan. There are quite a few who are very good at getting 2 higher up but can’t get 3 therefore those who can get 3 need to hit for 3.
So to the decision I mentioned earlier. I’m going to outline 2 alternatives below and everyone in the clan gets to vote on which we adopt. Feel free to add comments with your vote. Your vote is only counted if it’s in the forum as a reply to this thread. Anybody not voting will be assumed to be a No.
What a Yes vote means
1. I continue to lead
2. Forum posts by everyone are mandatory. Don’t post, you are opted out next war. If you don’t do a proper forum post, you are opted out of next war.
3. Forum posts for failed attacks are used as a review and also allow planning of next attack
4. War Defence CC’s are better shared out to lessen the load. If people don’t step up and pull their weight I’ll create a rota. If still not followed then the person is opted out of next war.
5. If you are a TH9 and get 3 starred a proper review of your base is carried out and you create an alternative to be considered for the next war.
6. War performance is looked at. If someone continually fails to deliver then they will be opted out of a war, maybe more. That doesn’t mean everyone needs to get 3s all the time, but instead if they get loads of 1s and fail to make adjustments they will be opted out.
7. On no account does someone war without AQ.
What a No vote means
1. I’m not leading
2. I adopt the same attitude as others. No forum post, turn up do my attacks and then switch to looting rather than have my camps full of golems or hounds to supply everyone throughout the war.
3. War methodology to be decided by whoever else leads, no longer my decision.
In reality I think we are a clan that likes to war. For the majority they turn up, do their 2 war attacks and then get back to regular looting. Some use the forum and create posts as I requested a long time ago, namely Target, Expected Stars and Confidence Level. Others at least make the effort to post in the forum but only list 1 target which is better than nothing, but really doesn’t do much for the planning. Very few say when they will attack. Then once we get into war, past the first wave of guys who did use the forum, there begins all the “who should I hit?” questions. OK let me pick a random number from my ass and there you go. I haven’t a clue what you think of the remaining bases so you tell me. It feels like the list of people who fall into that category is growing and it’s a pain in the ass. If it’s all written down in the forum it’s a hell of a lot easier to assign people targets and understand what might be best for the clan. And to those who can’t be arsed or think it’s a hassle to post on the forum, try making the decisions in war when you have no information.
The filling of defensive war cc’s falls on a small number of players, which consider a number have lvl2 witches now is a bit frustrating.
Then we have war performance.
Most keep bases regardless of whether they are 3 starred in previous wars.
Several need to change their mind set attack wise. I’m seeing the same people make the same mistakes in wars. I’ve added some videos previously to help people learn different tactics and I think everyone who does not get what they aimed for should be doing a review and figuring out what went wrong. That way they actually learn and should not make the same mistake again.
Something that needs to be clear is that 3 stars win wars and hitting higher for 2 rather than lower for 3 is not a benefit to the clan. There are quite a few who are very good at getting 2 higher up but can’t get 3 therefore those who can get 3 need to hit for 3.
So to the decision I mentioned earlier. I’m going to outline 2 alternatives below and everyone in the clan gets to vote on which we adopt. Feel free to add comments with your vote. Your vote is only counted if it’s in the forum as a reply to this thread. Anybody not voting will be assumed to be a No.
What a Yes vote means
1. I continue to lead
2. Forum posts by everyone are mandatory. Don’t post, you are opted out next war. If you don’t do a proper forum post, you are opted out of next war.
3. Forum posts for failed attacks are used as a review and also allow planning of next attack
4. War Defence CC’s are better shared out to lessen the load. If people don’t step up and pull their weight I’ll create a rota. If still not followed then the person is opted out of next war.
5. If you are a TH9 and get 3 starred a proper review of your base is carried out and you create an alternative to be considered for the next war.
6. War performance is looked at. If someone continually fails to deliver then they will be opted out of a war, maybe more. That doesn’t mean everyone needs to get 3s all the time, but instead if they get loads of 1s and fail to make adjustments they will be opted out.
7. On no account does someone war without AQ.
What a No vote means
1. I’m not leading
2. I adopt the same attitude as others. No forum post, turn up do my attacks and then switch to looting rather than have my camps full of golems or hounds to supply everyone throughout the war.
3. War methodology to be decided by whoever else leads, no longer my decision.
?) that I can 2 star all the th9s and try to identify any I can 3. (But im a bit hit and miss on the whole 3 starring thing). Could you do something similar? 